The Arab Awakening has surely wakened up nations, Malawi
inclusive. Expectedly therefore, citizens in nations across the globe have generally
positively reacted to issues of governance, human rights, freedom, and
development. Locally, it is little wonder that it is the Arab Awakening
mentality that is the guide in understanding the cashgate affair.
Among others, an Arab Awakening mentality demands that
citizens are treated as capable of thought-process. Surprisingly, the current
presidency happens to have missed this important fact. True to this statement,
the presidency is all busy throwing half-baked tantrums to the nation here and
there in the name of anti-cashgate measures. The Banda-Kachali presidency
thinks Malawians are the same old lot; the gullible, naïve, and pessimistic
lot.
It is repugnant to think that the state investigatory
machinery is, over two months down the line, still in its preliminary stages of
the Capital Hill looting investigations. This is laughable! One would hate to
think that the state, no matter how under-resourced it can claim to be, cannot,
in all fairness, conclude investigations for at least one of the alleged people
within the period elapsed.
For argument’s sake, let’s concede that the state is indeed
underresourced. Still, were those on the highest echelons of power that clean,
one would expect an immediate re-direction or re-routing of human and financial
resources to prioritize the cash-gate incident. This does not happen. And worse
still, everyday the nation hears the presidency making a barrage of
self-contradictory pronouncements purporting to address the saga. My foot!
And even if one entertains the argument that the prosecution
itself lacks political will to do a good job on the “cashgaters”, borrowing
Edge Kanyongolo’s term, one would rightly expect the presidency to act fast and
fine. In fact, one would anticipate the presidency to instill the spirit of
will and duty to the investigators knowing very well that, politically (or
personally?) speaking, the cashgate affair is a matter of sink or swim for it.
Expectedly, a person with clean conscience would choose the latter. But, sadly,
this presidency, as unclean as it most likely is, chooses none and only hopes
for the latter.
Putting all the foregoing into thought, one is left with one
conclusion; the mother ‘cashgater’ is not yet netted. In other words, there is
‘politics of politics’ at play in the whole cashgate saga with the presidency
at the center.
Comparatively, this line of thinking makes the most sense. This
is the case because if indeed cashgate revolves around presidency, then the
present circumstances surrounding the investigations—the slow pace of
investigations, the lack of will on the part of the investigators, the
dillydallying in the prosecution process, and the low levels of enthusiasm from
the presidency—become all too expected and thus predictable. True to that, this
is exactly what is on the ground.
In a nutshell, the presidency is the principal cashgater!
This be the case as it is, the ongoing investigations on the cashgate will,
therefore, be rightly said to be a sham. Like seriously, the whole
Lutepo-Manondo-Kasambara thing is nothing but a political cover-up of the
Capital Hill looting intended to face-save both the People’s Party (PP) and its
politburo. And one wonders, as many of the wiser readership do, “how would the
siphoning of billions of Malawi Kwachas come to pass without the blessing of
the presidency?” Impossible!
The truth of the matter, in as far as the trio—Kasambara,
Lutepo, and Manondo—is concerned is that there is no triable case as Kasambara
must have hinted the other day. You might wonder, why should there be no
triable case given the preponderance of evidence? Kasambara, again, has an
answer here, “President Joyce Banda is the witness”.
That’s it, no case! The reason being dragging the president
to stand in the dock will be the same as asking the president to come clean,
really clean, on the cashgate which, in Kasambara’s raw lawyering, will result
in giving pointers to the presidency’s role in the cashgate. And president
Banda is not too dull as to fail to sense this, and that’s why she is all
geared up gleaning support from all and sundry—the police, the media,
academicians—to create evidence to ensure that Kasambara does not get the day
and thus goes to hell alone when the hammer of justice gets hammered.
All in all, it is obvious, from simple observation, that the
presidency is at the centre of the cashgate so much so that there can not be
justice done, or seen to be done, on anyone connected with the cashgate
incident if the presidency does not receive its fair share of justice for its
role in the cashgate affair.
And this is where the independence of the judiciary gets tested with stakes all up too high!
No comments:
Post a Comment